Protest 933855-G of General Concessions Corp.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 933855-G of General Concessions Corp.

1 Cust. Ct. 435

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedOctober 11, 1938

DocketNo. 39565

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cust. Ct. 435 (Protest 933855-G of General Concessions Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 933855-G of General Concessions Corp., 1 Cust. Ct. 435 (cusc 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

The imitation wrist watches are attached to aD imitation leather strap or bracelet. The case of the watch is composed of a white metal and there are other metal parts. It has a glass crystal and a dial ornamented in gilt with figures of the hours in black on gilt. There are four or five different materials in the article but the component of chief value is not disclosed, no proof having been offered to establish that fact. There was proof that they are worn on the wrists of children for ornamental purposes and not for use. On the record presented the claim as to the watches was overruled. Abstract 38822, United States v. Bernard (5 Ct. Cust. Appls. 202, T. D. 34328) and United States v. Kraemer (id. 294, T. D. 34474) cited. It was stipulated that the peg tricks are in chief value of wood and in part of bamboo. They were therefore held properly assessed under paragraph 409. United States v. Borgfeldt (21 C. C. P. A. 170, T. D. 46496) cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

The imitation wrist watches are attached to aD imitation leather strap or bracelet. The case of the watch is composed of a white metal and there are other metal parts. It has a glass crystal and a dial ornamented in gilt with figures of the hours in black on gilt. There are four or five different materials in the article but the component of chief value is not disclosed, no proof having been offered to establish that fact. There was proof that they are worn on the wrists of children for ornamental purposes and not for use. On the record presented the claim as to the watches was overruled. Abstract 38822, United States v. Bernard (5 Ct. Cust. Appls. 202, T. D. 34328) and United States v. Kraemer (id. 294, T. D. 34474) cited. It was stipulated that the peg tricks are in chief value of wood and in part of bamboo. They were therefore held properly assessed under paragraph 409. United States v. Borgfeldt (21 C. C. P. A. 170, T. D. 46496) cited.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Cust. Ct. 435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-933855-g-of-general-concessions-corp-cusc-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack