Protest 933139-G of Keene
This text of 1 Cust. Ct. 491 (Protest 933139-G of Keene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
It appeared that the bales in which the goods were packed were marked “Seotl’d” and that the rags themselves are not capable of being marked. It was found that this marking suggests Scotland to all and that it does something more than hint at the name of the acceptable marking prescribed in the customs regulations. Lorillard v. United States (24 C. C. P. A. 90, T. D. 48412), Abstracts 37656, 38243, 36598, T. D. 47007, American Burtonizing Co. v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 652, T. D. 41489), and Vandegrift v. United States (id. 328, T. D. 41235) cited. The protest was therefore sustained^
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Cust. Ct. 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-933139-g-of-keene-cusc-1938.