Protest 933135-G of Friedman Bros. Drawing Instrument Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 933135-G of Friedman Bros. Drawing Instrument Co.

1 Cust. Ct. 493

United States Customs Court·Decided November 18, 1938·No. No. 39897·Published

Opinion

Opinion ’by

Cline, J.

It appeared that the slide rules in question were each •contained in a black paper container or case when imported and that the ■jyords ■“Friedmann Germany” appeared in the center of each of the slide rules but were ■not visible when the slide was closed. Marking in the groove of the slides was held not to be “in a conspicuous place” within the statutory provision. The (protest was (therefore overruled. Polk v. United States (C. D. 52) and Abstract 29289 cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion ’by

Cline, J.

It appeared that the slide rules in question were each •contained in a black paper container or case when imported and that the ■jyords ■“Friedmann Germany” appeared in the center of each of the slide rules but were ■not visible when the slide was closed. Marking in the groove of the slides was held not to be “in a conspicuous place” within the statutory provision. The (protest was (therefore overruled. Polk v. United States (C. D. 52) and Abstract 29289 cited.

Protest 933135-G of Friedman Bros. Drawing Instrument Co., 1 Cust. Ct. 493 (cusc 1938).

Pincite

1 Cust. Ct. 493 (Protest 933135-G of Friedman Bros. Drawing Instrument Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.