Protest 931976-G of E. E. Marks Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 931976-G of E. E. Marks Co.

2 Cust. Ct. 703

United States Customs Court·Decided May 12, 1939·No. No. 41305·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It appeared that the anise seed is not capable of being marked. It was packed in bags which were marked “Product of Tongking.” The goods were shipped from Marseilles, Prance. It appeared that Tongking is a protectorate of France. It was therefore held that the marking was within the customs regulations published in T. D. 46978 and held reasonable in Mitsui v. United States (T. D. 49357). The protest was therefore sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It appeared that the anise seed is not capable of being marked. It was packed in bags which were marked “Product of Tongking.” The goods were shipped from Marseilles, Prance. It appeared that Tongking is a protectorate of France. It was therefore held that the marking was within the customs regulations published in T. D. 46978 and held reasonable in Mitsui v. United States (T. D. 49357). The protest was therefore sustained.

Protest 931976-G of E. E. Marks Co., 2 Cust. Ct. 703 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

2 Cust. Ct. 703 (Protest 931976-G of E. E. Marks Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.