Protest 929556-G of F. Loeser & Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 929556-G of F. Loeser & Co.

2 Cust. Ct. 633

United States Customs Court·Decided March 23, 1939·No. No. 40908·Published

Opinion

[634] Opinion by

Dallingek, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of inkstands, blotters, paper knives, and trays chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373), Dow v. United States (21 C. C. P. A. 282, T. D. 46816), and United States v. Friedlaender (id. 103, T. D. 46445) cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[634] Opinion by

Dallingek, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of inkstands, blotters, paper knives, and trays chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373), Dow v. United States (21 C. C. P. A. 282, T. D. 46816), and United States v. Friedlaender (id. 103, T. D. 46445) cited.

Protest 929556-G of F. Loeser & Co., 2 Cust. Ct. 633 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

2 Cust. Ct. 633 (Protest 929556-G of F. Loeser & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.