Protest 923027-G/87082 of Oscar Leistner, Inc.
9 Cust. Ct. 414
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Minami v. United States (1 Cust. Ct. 307, C. D. 72) the wreaths in question were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 353 as articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, such as signs. The protest was therefore sustained as to that claim.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protest 923027-G/87082 of Oscar Leistner, Inc., 9 Cust. Ct. 414 (cusc 1942).
9 Cust. Ct. 414 (Protest 923027-G/87082 of Oscar Leistner, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
M. Minami & Co. v. United States
1 Cust. Ct. 307 (U.S. Customs Court, 1938)