Protest 920850-G of Parfumerie Lubin Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 920850-G of Parfumerie Lubin Co.

1 Cust. Ct. 548

United States Customs Court·Decided December 21, 1938·No. No. 40184·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

From the evidence it was found that the merchandise is bottles “suitable for use and of the character ordinarily employed for the holding or transportation of merchandise,” perfumes, cologne, and toilet water. In view of the evidence and samples and on the authority of United States v. Hudnut (17 C. C. P. A. 207, T. D. 43649) the perfume bottles in question were held dutiable at the appropriate rate under paragraph 217 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

From the evidence it was found that the merchandise is bottles “suitable for use and of the character ordinarily employed for the holding or transportation of merchandise,” perfumes, cologne, and toilet water. In view of the evidence and samples and on the authority of United States v. Hudnut (17 C. C. P. A. 207, T. D. 43649) the perfume bottles in question were held dutiable at the appropriate rate under paragraph 217 as claimed.

Protest 920850-G of Parfumerie Lubin Co., 1 Cust. Ct. 548 (cusc 1938).

Pincite

1 Cust. Ct. 548 (Protest 920850-G of Parfumerie Lubin Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.