Protest 912949-G of Connor

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 912949-G of Connor

1 Cust. Ct. 515

United States Customs Court·Decided December 2, 1938·No. No. 39995·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It appeared that the merchandise is copra the product of the Dutch East Indies. It was packed in bags marked “Produce of N. E. I.” The courts having consistently held that the initials of the country of origin alone are not sufficient as a marking legend, the protest was overruled. American Burtonizing Co. v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 652, T. D. 41489) and Abstract 39461 followed. Abstracts 38243 and 32638 distinguished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It appeared that the merchandise is copra the product of the Dutch East Indies. It was packed in bags marked “Produce of N. E. I.” The courts having consistently held that the initials of the country of origin alone are not sufficient as a marking legend, the protest was overruled. American Burtonizing Co. v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 652, T. D. 41489) and Abstract 39461 followed. Abstracts 38243 and 32638 distinguished.

Protest 912949-G of Connor, 1 Cust. Ct. 515 (cusc 1938).

Pincite

1 Cust. Ct. 515 (Protest 912949-G of Connor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related