Protest 911990-G of New York Merchandise Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 911990-G of New York Merchandise Co.

10 Cust. Ct. 418

United States Customs Court·Decided March 13, 1943·No. No. 48101·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel brass base shells, similar to those the subject of New York Merchandise Co., Inc. v. United States (8 Cust. Ct. 209, C. D. 607), were held dutiable as claimed, as articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, such as signs, at 35 percent under paragraph 353; and paperweights similar to those the subject of Woolworth v. United States (26 C. C. P. A. 221, C. A. D. 20) were held dutiable as household utensils at 40 percent under paragraph 339, as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel brass base shells, similar to those the subject of New York Merchandise Co., Inc. v. United States (8 Cust. Ct. 209, C. D. 607), were held dutiable as claimed, as articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, such as signs, at 35 percent under paragraph 353; and paperweights similar to those the subject of Woolworth v. United States (26 C. C. P. A. 221, C. A. D. 20) were held dutiable as household utensils at 40 percent under paragraph 339, as claimed.

Protest 911990-G of New York Merchandise Co., 10 Cust. Ct. 418 (cusc 1943).

Pincite

10 Cust. Ct. 418 (Protest 911990-G of New York Merchandise Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related