Protest 911161-G of Greeff

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 911161-G of Greeff

2 Cust. Ct. 679

United States Customs Court·Decided April 27, 1939·No. No. 41155·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It appeared that the article called “iron by hydrogen” is the reduction of an oxide of iron by a jet of hydrogen leaving the element iron in powdered form with slight impurities, and that it is principally used for medicinal purposes. There was no proof in the record of its industrial use. The protest was therefore overruled. Mantle Lamp Co. v. United States (T. D. 48927) and Harrison Supply Co. v. United States (164 Fed. 155) distinguished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It appeared that the article called “iron by hydrogen” is the reduction of an oxide of iron by a jet of hydrogen leaving the element iron in powdered form with slight impurities, and that it is principally used for medicinal purposes. There was no proof in the record of its industrial use. The protest was therefore overruled. Mantle Lamp Co. v. United States (T. D. 48927) and Harrison Supply Co. v. United States (164 Fed. 155) distinguished.

Protest 911161-G of Greeff, 2 Cust. Ct. 679 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

2 Cust. Ct. 679 (Protest 911161-G of Greeff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related