Protest 911161-G of Greeff

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 911161-G of Greeff

2 Cust. Ct. 679

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedApril 27, 1939

DocketNo. 41155

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Cust. Ct. 679 (Protest 911161-G of Greeff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 911161-G of Greeff, 2 Cust. Ct. 679 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It appeared that the article called “iron by hydrogen” is the reduction of an oxide of iron by a jet of hydrogen leaving the element iron in powdered form with slight impurities, and that it is principally used for medicinal purposes. There was no proof in the record of its industrial use. The protest was therefore overruled. Mantle Lamp Co. v. United States (T. D. 48927) and Harrison Supply Co. v. United States (164 Fed. 155) distinguished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It appeared that the article called “iron by hydrogen” is the reduction of an oxide of iron by a jet of hydrogen leaving the element iron in powdered form with slight impurities, and that it is principally used for medicinal purposes. There was no proof in the record of its industrial use. The protest was therefore overruled. Mantle Lamp Co. v. United States (T. D. 48927) and Harrison Supply Co. v. United States (164 Fed. 155) distinguished.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Cust. Ct. 679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-911161-g-of-greeff-cusc-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack