Protest 909146-G of Joseph Horne Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 909146-G of Joseph Horne Co.

1 Cust. Ct. 536

United States Customs Court·Decided December 15, 1938·No. No. 40107·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Rugs imported from China had a paper-covered fabric label sewed to the corner containing the words “Made in Tientsin, China..” Each rug was wrapped in oil paper and covered with burlap, the burlap covering being legally marked. On the authority of Kraft v. United States (22 C. C. P. A. 111, T. D. 47103) and Givaudan v. United States (id. 115, T. D. 47104) the protest was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Rugs imported from China had a paper-covered fabric label sewed to the corner containing the words “Made in Tientsin, China..” Each rug was wrapped in oil paper and covered with burlap, the burlap covering being legally marked. On the authority of Kraft v. United States (22 C. C. P. A. 111, T. D. 47103) and Givaudan v. United States (id. 115, T. D. 47104) the protest was sustained.

Protest 909146-G of Joseph Horne Co., 1 Cust. Ct. 536 (cusc 1938).

Pincite

1 Cust. Ct. 536 (Protest 909146-G of Joseph Horne Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.