Protest 908779-G of Gemsco
1 Cust. Ct. 394
This text of 1 Cust. Ct. 394 (Protest 908779-G of Gemsco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Protest 908779-G of Gemsco, 1 Cust. Ct. 394 (cusc 1938).
Opinion
Opinion by
The record shows that the merchandise is used to finish or trim what is known in the navy as cocked hats. The provision for trimmings in paragraph 1529 was held to be more specific than the provisions of paragraph 1308. ■ The protest was therefore overruled. United States v. Noe (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 200, T. D. 40180) cited.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Noe & Sons
12 Ct. Cust. 200 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1924)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Cust. Ct. 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-908779-g-of-gemsco-cusc-1938.