Protest 907656-G of Fried Bros.
This text of 1 Cust. Ct. 536 (Protest 907656-G of Fried Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[537]*537Opinion by
The question involved is whether the word “Hungaria” printed on the leather is sufficient compliance with the law. The immediate containers were not marked. A search of the dictionaries and encyclopaedias showed that the word “Hungaria" is Latin and not English. The court was of the opinion that American purchasers, consumers, or users of the goods would not understand that the leather was the product of Hungary, especially as the word was used as a part of a design or trade mark. On the authority of American Burtonizing Co. v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 652, T. D. 41489) the marking was held not sufficient and the protest was overruled. ,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Cust. Ct. 536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-907656-g-of-fried-bros-cusc-1938.