Protest 90481-K of McMinn & Davis Co.
13 Cust. Ct. 321
Opinion
Opinion by
At the trial the examiner identified the articles as parts of polo mallets. As paragraph 1502 as modified provides for polo mallets, but not parts of such equipment, the protest was overruled, citing Huber v. United States (11 Cust. Ct. 55, C. D. 793).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protest 90481-K of McMinn & Davis Co., 13 Cust. Ct. 321 (cusc 1944).
13 Cust. Ct. 321 (Protest 90481-K of McMinn & Davis Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
W. X. Huber Co. v. United States
11 Cust. Ct. 55 (U.S. Customs Court, 1943)