Protest 901256-G of David P. Barry Corp.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 901256-G of David P. Barry Corp.

2 Cust. Ct. 593

United States Customs Court·Decided March 1, 1939·No. No. 40738·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

For the reason that these articles are not in chief value of metal it was held that the collector’s classification under paragraph 1527 (c) cannot be sustained. On the record presented and in view of United States v. Doragon (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 182, T. D. 41051) and United States v. Cohn (19 C. C. P. A. 137, T. D. 45259) the leather cuff links in question were held properly classified under paragraph 1527 (a).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

For the reason that these articles are not in chief value of metal it was held that the collector’s classification under paragraph 1527 (c) cannot be sustained. On the record presented and in view of United States v. Doragon (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 182, T. D. 41051) and United States v. Cohn (19 C. C. P. A. 137, T. D. 45259) the leather cuff links in question were held properly classified under paragraph 1527 (a).

Protest 901256-G of David P. Barry Corp., 2 Cust. Ct. 593 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

2 Cust. Ct. 593 (Protest 901256-G of David P. Barry Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related