Protest 898056-G Kress
6 Cust. Ct. 652
This text of 6 Cust. Ct. 652 (Protest 898056-G Kress) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Protest 898056-G Kress, 6 Cust. Ct. 652 (cusc 1941).
Opinion
Opinion by.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Butler v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D, 303) the Rockingham earthenware in question was held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 210 as claimed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Butler Bros. v. United States
4 Cust. Ct. 120 (U.S. Customs Court, 1940)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
6 Cust. Ct. 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-898056-g-kress-cusc-1941.