Protest 897163-G of Frankel

2 Cust. Ct. 628
United States Customs Court·Decided March 21, 1939·No. No. 40879·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[629]*629Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was held that the burden is upon the plaintiff to prove, first,.whether.or not the returning traveler was a resident of the United States returning from abroad; second, whether the articles acquired abroad were for the plaintiff’s personal or household use or were purchased as souvenirs or curios; third, whether or not the articles were purchased on commission or intended for sale; fourth, whether or not the plaintiff had been granted an exemption upon other articles; and fifth, •whether the articles in question are such that may be included- within the free entry provisions of the statute. As there was a failure to establish any of the evidentiary facts required, the protest was overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Protest 897163-G of Frankel, 2 Cust. Ct. 628 (cusc 1939).

2 Cust. Ct. 628 (Protest 897163-G of Frankel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Saterlie v. United States
39 Cust. Ct. 214 (U.S. Customs Court, 1957)