Protest 897163-G of Frankel

2 Cust. Ct. 628
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMarch 21, 1939
DocketNo. 40879
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Cust. Ct. 628 (Protest 897163-G of Frankel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Protest 897163-G of Frankel, 2 Cust. Ct. 628 (cusc 1939).

Opinion

[629]*629Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was held that the burden is upon the plaintiff to prove, first,.whether.or not the returning traveler was a resident of the United States returning from abroad; second, whether the articles acquired abroad were for the plaintiff’s personal or household use or were purchased as souvenirs or curios; third, whether or not the articles were purchased on commission or intended for sale; fourth, whether or not the plaintiff had been granted an exemption upon other articles; and fifth, •whether the articles in question are such that may be included- within the free entry provisions of the statute. As there was a failure to establish any of the evidentiary facts required, the protest was overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Saterlie v. United States
39 Cust. Ct. 214 (U.S. Customs Court, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Cust. Ct. 628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-897163-g-of-frankel-cusc-1939.