Protest 894055-G of Butler Bros.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 894055-G of Butler Bros.

10 Cust. Ct. 354

United States Customs Court·Decided December 16, 1942·No. No. 47806·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the antimony articles in question were held dutiable as household utensils, not plated, at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as claimed. It was further stipulated that certain of the merchandise in question consists of metal animal figures, chains, and mechanical pencils similar to those involved in Woolworth v. United States (26 C. C. P. A. 221, C. A. D. 20). In accordance therewith the metal figures and chains were held dutiable as household utensils at 40 percent under paragraph 339, and the pencils were held dutiable under paragraph 1550, at the same rates as those imposed by the collector.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the antimony articles in question were held dutiable as household utensils, not plated, at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as claimed. It was further stipulated that certain of the merchandise in question consists of metal animal figures, chains, and mechanical pencils similar to those involved in Woolworth v. United States (26 C. C. P. A. 221, C. A. D. 20). In accordance therewith the metal figures and chains were held dutiable as household utensils at 40 percent under paragraph 339, and the pencils were held dutiable under paragraph 1550, at the same rates as those imposed by the collector.

Protest 894055-G of Butler Bros., 10 Cust. Ct. 354 (cusc 1942).

Pincite

10 Cust. Ct. 354 (Protest 894055-G of Butler Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.