Protest 890764-G of Reichenbach & Co.
1 Cust. Ct. 430
Opinion
Opinion by
It appeared that the linen was woven in Ireland and was not treated or manufactured in any manner in Switzerland. Both the linen and the immediate containers were marked “Made in Switzerland” and the customs officers required them to be remarked “Made in Ireland.” On the authority of Loblaw v. United States (T. D. 46760) the protest was overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protest 890764-G of Reichenbach & Co., 1 Cust. Ct. 430 (cusc 1938).
1 Cust. Ct. 430 (Protest 890764-G of Reichenbach & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Parodi Erminio & Co. v. United States
6 Cust. Ct. 288 (U.S. Customs Court, 1941)
Kunreuther & Merfeld, Inc. v. United States
5 Cust. Ct. 104 (U.S. Customs Court, 1940)
United States v. Friedlaender & Co.
27 C.C.P.A. 297 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1940)