Protest 890764-G of Reichenbach & Co.
1 Cust. Ct. 430
This text of 1 Cust. Ct. 430 (Protest 890764-G of Reichenbach & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Protest 890764-G of Reichenbach & Co., 1 Cust. Ct. 430 (cusc 1938).
Opinion
Opinion by
It appeared that the linen was woven in Ireland and was not treated or manufactured in any manner in Switzerland. Both the linen and the immediate containers were marked “Made in Switzerland” and the customs officers required them to be remarked “Made in Ireland.” On the authority of Loblaw v. United States (T. D. 46760) the protest was overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Parodi Erminio & Co. v. United States
6 Cust. Ct. 288 (U.S. Customs Court, 1941)
Kunreuther & Merfeld, Inc. v. United States
5 Cust. Ct. 104 (U.S. Customs Court, 1940)
United States v. Friedlaender & Co.
27 C.C.P.A. 297 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1940)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Cust. Ct. 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-890764-g-of-reichenbach-co-cusc-1938.