Protest 877122-G of Keasbey & Mattison Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 877122-G of Keasbey & Mattison Co.

2 Cust. Ct. 727

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMay 29, 1939

DocketNo. 41456

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Cust. Ct. 727 (Protest 877122-G of Keasbey & Mattison Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 877122-G of Keasbey & Mattison Co., 2 Cust. Ct. 727 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It appeared that the fiber in question was imported from Southern Rhodesia, packed in bags which were marked “Rhodesian Asbestos Fiber.” It was found that the word “Rhodesian” in the marking evidently was -intended to convey the impression that the merchandise originated in Rhodesia, but there are two countries bearing that name, Northern Rhodesia and Southern Rhodesia. Being of the opinion that it would be necessary to speculate, investigate, or interpret in order that the American purchaser or user of the merchandise herein involved might ascertain the country of origin from the marking “Rhodesian Asbestos Fiber” the court held that it was not legally marked and overruled the protest. Asbtracts 37097, 39520, 40109, and American Burtonizing Co. v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 652, T. D. 41489) cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It appeared that the fiber in question was imported from Southern Rhodesia, packed in bags which were marked “Rhodesian Asbestos Fiber.” It was found that the word “Rhodesian” in the marking evidently was -intended to convey the impression that the merchandise originated in Rhodesia, but there are two countries bearing that name, Northern Rhodesia and Southern Rhodesia. Being of the opinion that it would be necessary to speculate, investigate, or interpret in order that the American purchaser or user of the merchandise herein involved might ascertain the country of origin from the marking “Rhodesian Asbestos Fiber” the court held that it was not legally marked and overruled the protest. Asbtracts 37097, 39520, 40109, and American Burtonizing Co. v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 652, T. D. 41489) cited.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Cust. Ct. 727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-877122-g-of-keasbey-mattison-co-cusc-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack