Protest 874729-G of Horni Signal Mfg. Co.

1 Cust. Ct. 522
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedDecember 7, 1938
DocketNo. 40039
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cust. Ct. 522 (Protest 874729-G of Horni Signal Mfg. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Protest 874729-G of Horni Signal Mfg. Co., 1 Cust. Ct. 522 (cusc 1938).

Opinion

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

While the merchandise was invoiced as glass balls it was found not to be exactly globular. The exhibit resembles two half globes of different diameters joined in the center. From the testimony it was found that in its imported condition the article does not illuminate, either by reflection or otherwise. When finished it becomes an article that reflects light. On the authority of Petrocelli v. United States (T. D. 46269) it was held not to be dutiable under paragraph 218 (c). The claim at 50 percent under paragraph 230 (d) was sustained. Solomon v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 353, T. D. 41256) cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Solomon v. United States
13 Ct. Cust. 353 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Cust. Ct. 522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-874729-g-of-horni-signal-mfg-co-cusc-1938.