Protest 86987-G of R. H. Macy & Co.
3 Cust. Ct. 366
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Amrein v. United States (T. D. 49551), Pustet v. United Stales (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396), and United States v. Smith (12 id. 384, T. D. 40544) Normandy laces, embroidered galloons, and embroidered articles in part of lace were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protest 86987-G of R. H. Macy & Co., 3 Cust. Ct. 366 (cusc 1939).
3 Cust. Ct. 366 (Protest 86987-G of R. H. Macy & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pustet v. United States
13 Ct. Cust. 530 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1926)