Protest 86987-G of R. H. Macy & Co.
3 Cust. Ct. 366
This text of 3 Cust. Ct. 366 (Protest 86987-G of R. H. Macy & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Protest 86987-G of R. H. Macy & Co., 3 Cust. Ct. 366 (cusc 1939).
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Amrein v. United States (T. D. 49551), Pustet v. United Stales (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396), and United States v. Smith (12 id. 384, T. D. 40544) Normandy laces, embroidered galloons, and embroidered articles in part of lace were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Pustet v. United States
13 Ct. Cust. 530 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1926)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 Cust. Ct. 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-86987-g-of-r-h-macy-co-cusc-1939.