Protest 867861-G of Tuska Son
6 Cust. Ct. 596
Opinion
Opinion by
It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of Rockinghamware earthenware the same as that passed upon in Butter v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 303). The claim at 25 percent under paragraph 210 was therefore sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protest 867861-G of Tuska Son, 6 Cust. Ct. 596 (cusc 1941).
6 Cust. Ct. 596 (Protest 867861-G of Tuska Son) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Butler Bros. v. United States
4 Cust. Ct. 120 (U.S. Customs Court, 1940)