Protest 847678-G of E. H. Silberman Paper Co.
3 Cust. Ct. 443
Opinion
Opinion by
There was testimony that the merchandise in question was chiefly used for paper making. It was therefore held free of duty as paper stock under paragraph 1750 as claimed. United States v. Herrmann (154 Fed. 196, T. D. 27981) and Stern v. United States (2 Ct. Cust. Appls. 405. T. D. 32167) cited relative to the production of samples.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protest 847678-G of E. H. Silberman Paper Co., 3 Cust. Ct. 443 (cusc 1939).
3 Cust. Ct. 443 (Protest 847678-G of E. H. Silberman Paper Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stern Bros. v. United States
2 Ct. Cust. 405 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1912)
United States v. Herrmann
154 F. 196 (Second Circuit, 1907)