Protest 846399-G of Tupman Thurlow Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 846399-G of Tupman Thurlow Co.

10 Cust. Ct. 378

United States Customs Court·Decided January 20, 1943·No. No. 47937·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Cline, J.

When the case was called for trial counsel for the plaintiff introduced in evidence without objection on the part of the Government the report of the collector of customs and the customs inspector with respect to the marking of the merchandise. The report of the inspector shows that the cases were marked “Sud. Africa.” No report of the collector was found in the papers. It was found that the evidence introduced had no bearing on the claims made in the protest, which was accordingly overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Cline, J.

When the case was called for trial counsel for the plaintiff introduced in evidence without objection on the part of the Government the report of the collector of customs and the customs inspector with respect to the marking of the merchandise. The report of the inspector shows that the cases were marked “Sud. Africa.” No report of the collector was found in the papers. It was found that the evidence introduced had no bearing on the claims made in the protest, which was accordingly overruled.

Protest 846399-G of Tupman Thurlow Co., 10 Cust. Ct. 378 (cusc 1943).

Pincite

10 Cust. Ct. 378 (Protest 846399-G of Tupman Thurlow Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.