Protest 846399-G of Tupman Thurlow Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 846399-G of Tupman Thurlow Co.

10 Cust. Ct. 378

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJanuary 20, 1943

DocketNo. 47937

StatusPublished

This text of 10 Cust. Ct. 378 (Protest 846399-G of Tupman Thurlow Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 846399-G of Tupman Thurlow Co., 10 Cust. Ct. 378 (cusc 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Cline, J.

When the case was called for trial counsel for the plaintiff introduced in evidence without objection on the part of the Government the report of the collector of customs and the customs inspector with respect to the marking of the merchandise. The report of the inspector shows that the cases were marked “Sud. Africa.” No report of the collector was found in the papers. It was found that the evidence introduced had no bearing on the claims made in the protest, which was accordingly overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Cline, J.

When the case was called for trial counsel for the plaintiff introduced in evidence without objection on the part of the Government the report of the collector of customs and the customs inspector with respect to the marking of the merchandise. The report of the inspector shows that the cases were marked “Sud. Africa.” No report of the collector was found in the papers. It was found that the evidence introduced had no bearing on the claims made in the protest, which was accordingly overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Cust. Ct. 378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-846399-g-of-tupman-thurlow-co-cusc-1943.