Protest 838552-G of Samuel Shapiro & Co.
3 Cust. Ct. 409
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Laurence Phillips v. United States (T. D. 49624) it was held that the timber in question should not have been assessed under section 601 (c) (6). The protest was sustained as to the board measurement of lumber on the authority of Myers v. United States (T. D. 49530).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protest 838552-G of Samuel Shapiro & Co., 3 Cust. Ct. 409 (cusc 1939).
3 Cust. Ct. 409 (Protest 838552-G of Samuel Shapiro & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.