Protest 838443-G of A. L. Tuska Son & Co.

5 Cust. Ct. 417
United States Customs Court·Decided December 5, 1940·No. No. 44857·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of Rockingham earthenware the same as that passed upon in Butler v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 303). The claim at 25 percent under paragraph 210 was therefore sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Protest 838443-G of A. L. Tuska Son & Co., 5 Cust. Ct. 417 (cusc 1940).

5 Cust. Ct. 417 (Protest 838443-G of A. L. Tuska Son & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Butler Bros. v. United States
4 Cust. Ct. 120 (U.S. Customs Court, 1940)