Protest 835131-G of Sterling Bag Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 835131-G of Sterling Bag Co.

10 Cust. Ct. 386

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJanuary 30, 1943

DocketNo. 47975

StatusPublished

This text of 10 Cust. Ct. 386 (Protest 835131-G of Sterling Bag Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 835131-G of Sterling Bag Co., 10 Cust. Ct. 386 (cusc 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Cline, J.

From the record it does not appear that the jute cloth was marked in such manner as to indicate the country of origin but the bales were marked with the word “Italia.” The importer was required to mark them “Made in Italy” before they were released. In view of Abstracts 43272 and 43898 the court found that the marking “Italia” was sufficient and that the bales therefore were legally marked. Following Kraft v. United States (22 C. C. P. A. 111, T. D. 47103) the merchandise was held not subject to the additional duty.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Cline, J.

From the record it does not appear that the jute cloth was marked in such manner as to indicate the country of origin but the bales were marked with the word “Italia.” The importer was required to mark them “Made in Italy” before they were released. In view of Abstracts 43272 and 43898 the court found that the marking “Italia” was sufficient and that the bales therefore were legally marked. Following Kraft v. United States (22 C. C. P. A. 111, T. D. 47103) the merchandise was held not subject to the additional duty.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Cust. Ct. 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-835131-g-of-sterling-bag-co-cusc-1943.