Protest 82955-K of Gambarelli & Davitto

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 82955-K of Gambarelli & Davitto

12 Cust. Ct. 235

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedDecember 31, 1943

DocketNo. 49098

StatusPublished

This text of 12 Cust. Ct. 235 (Protest 82955-K of Gambarelli & Davitto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 82955-K of Gambarelli & Davitto, 12 Cust. Ct. 235 (cusc 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It appeared that the plaintiff claimed the refund of duty solely by reason of the provisions of section 563 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938. In view of these provisions it was held that this court is without jurisdiction to direct the collector to make an abatement in duties because of any injury, deterioration, loss, or damage [236]*236sustained by merchandise while remaining in customs custody. ' On the authority of Abstract 27365- the court' dismissed the protest.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It appeared that the plaintiff claimed the refund of duty solely by reason of the provisions of section 563 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938. In view of these provisions it was held that this court is without jurisdiction to direct the collector to make an abatement in duties because of any injury, deterioration, loss, or damage [236]*236sustained by merchandise while remaining in customs custody. ' On the authority of Abstract 27365- the court' dismissed the protest.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 Cust. Ct. 235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-82955-k-of-gambarelli-davitto-cusc-1943.