Protest 82794-K of Golden Gate Basket Factory
Opinion
Opinion by
When the case was called for trial the examiner who-had advisorily classified the item described it as “a piece of veneer, possibly 12 or 13 inches square, uniform size, having a tin top with indentation on the surface at which points the wood is to be bent to make a fruit box.” He further stated on cross-examination that it had been further advanced than “just plain Wood.” On the record presented the court could see no reason for disturbing the action of the collector, which was held presumptively correct.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
13 Cust. Ct. 320 (Protest 82794-K of Golden Gate Basket Factory) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.