Protest 8259-K of Swift
This text of 7 Cust. Ct. 314 (Protest 8259-K of Swift) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
There was a question as to whether the letter “D” was embossed on these particular drums in question to signify that they were drawback drums, in compliance with various regulations of the Treasury Department. Several witnesses were called. The Government admitted the evidence established that the 10 drums in question were not embossed with the letter “D” but contended that there is no proof that the manufacturers complied with the requirements of the Treasury Department. From the evidence it was held that these drums are clearly not included in the requirement as having been made from foreign materials and being marked to indicate the payment of drawback, and that since they were not so marked no drawback was claimed thereon. The drums were exported as containers of lubricating- oil and it was held that such oil has been consistently held to come within the meaning of “acids or other chemicals.” From a consideration of the entire record the court was of the opinion that the drums are entitled to free entry as American goods returned and that no drawback has been paid. The protest was therefore sustained as to the 10 drums in question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 Cust. Ct. 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-8259-k-of-swift-cusc-1941.