Protest 822791-G of Daly

9 Cust. Ct. 408
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedSeptember 2, 1942
DocketNo. 47526
StatusPublished

This text of 9 Cust. Ct. 408 (Protest 822791-G of Daly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Protest 822791-G of Daly, 9 Cust. Ct. 408 (cusc 1942).

Opinion

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial plaintiffs’ witness testified that the merchandise in question is bought and sold by them upon the basis of 800 pounds to the bale whether it weighed more or less than such amount, and that that was the practice in the cotton industry. It was admitted, however, that the plaintiffs did not weigh any of the bales imported herein. From an examination of the invoice and entry papers nothing was found to show that the customs officials performed their duties otherwise than in accordance with law nor was anything found to indicate that an excessive moisture existed or that a claim for allowance upon such ground was filed with the collector. The evidence presented failed to disclose anything sufficient to overcome the piesumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action. The protest was therefore overruled. United States v. Ingram (17 C. C. P. A. 228, T. D. 43668), Perkins, Goodwin & Co. v. United States (160 Fed. 272), and Frame v. United States (G. A. 8888, T. D. 40476) cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Perkins v. United States
160 F. 272 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 Cust. Ct. 408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-822791-g-of-daly-cusc-1942.