Protest 821485-G of Forrest
4 Cust. Ct. 467
Opinion
Opinion by
It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of feeding oat groats and feeding rolled oats similar to that the subject of Tower v. United States (25 C. C. P. A. 408, T. D. 49486) and Forrest v. United States (2 Cust. Ct. 425, C. D. 169). The claim at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 was therefore sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protest 821485-G of Forrest, 4 Cust. Ct. 467 (cusc 1940).
4 Cust. Ct. 467 (Protest 821485-G of Forrest) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Forrest v. United States
2 Cust. Ct. 425 (U.S. Customs Court, 1939)