Protest 820922-G of Delapenha

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 820922-G of Delapenha

11 Cust. Ct. 219

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJuly 15, 1943

DocketNo. 48560

StatusPublished

This text of 11 Cust. Ct. 219 (Protest 820922-G of Delapenha) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 820922-G of Delapenha, 11 Cust. Ct. 219 (cusc 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The record showed that the importation consisted of prepared peas in tins, the product of Belgium, and that at the time of importation the immediate containers, the tins, were marked “Belgique.” The importer was required to mark them with the words “Product of Belgium” before they were released. Following Vandegrift v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 328, T. D. 41235) the court found that the merchandise was not legally marked. The protest was therefore overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The record showed that the importation consisted of prepared peas in tins, the product of Belgium, and that at the time of importation the immediate containers, the tins, were marked “Belgique.” The importer was required to mark them with the words “Product of Belgium” before they were released. Following Vandegrift v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 328, T. D. 41235) the court found that the merchandise was not legally marked. The protest was therefore overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Cust. Ct. 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-820922-g-of-delapenha-cusc-1943.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack