Protest 819949-G of Kress

2 Cust. Ct. 736
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJune 5, 1939
DocketNo. 41517
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 Cust. Ct. 736 (Protest 819949-G of Kress) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Protest 819949-G of Kress, 2 Cust. Ct. 736 (cusc 1939).

Opinion

[737]*737Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

It was agreed that the component material of chief value is india rubber. The court, judging from the effort required to inflate the articles, found that they are not suitable for young children. United States v. Halle (20 C. C. P. A. 219, T. D. 45995) cited. The evidence presented is of the chief use of these articles by adults and to some extent by children under 12 or 13 to sustain their weight in the water. Morse v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 553, T. D. 41432) cited. Oh the evidence the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1537 was sustained.

McClelland, P. J., concurred in the conclusion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis Products, Inc. v. United States
60 Cust. Ct. 68 (U.S. Customs Court, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Cust. Ct. 736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-819949-g-of-kress-cusc-1939.