Protest 811802-G/10596 of Missouri Pacific Railroad
Opinion
Opinion by
At the hearing several affidavits and documents were offered in evidence by plaintiff but were denied admission by the court, following Thornley v. United States (19 C. C. P. A. 221, T. D. 45325). It appeared from a review of the record that the plaintiff offered no competent evidence to establish the actual quantity of lumber imported. An inspector of customs testified that he took three measurements, length, breadth, and height, but he could only say the amount indicated by such measurements did not exceed the amount specified on the consumption entry permit. On the record presented the protest was overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
11 Cust. Ct. 294 (Protest 811802-G/10596 of Missouri Pacific Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.