Protest 805703-G of Langfelder, Homma & Hayward, Inc.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 805703-G of Langfelder, Homma & Hayward, Inc.

2 Cust. Ct. 726

United States Customs Court·Decided May 29, 1939·No. No. 41453·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) uninflated rubber balls or so-called beach balls the same as those the subject of United States v. Woolworth (24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770) at 30 percent under paragraph 1502; (2) wooden lacquered cabinets similar to those the subject of Abstract 37636 at 33⅝ percent under paragraph 412; and (3) microscope sets at 45 percent under paragraph 228 (b), United States v. Wolf (26 C. C. P. A. 243, C. A. D. 23) followed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) uninflated rubber balls or so-called beach balls the same as those the subject of United States v. Woolworth (24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770) at 30 percent under paragraph 1502; (2) wooden lacquered cabinets similar to those the subject of Abstract 37636 at 33⅝ percent under paragraph 412; and (3) microscope sets at 45 percent under paragraph 228 (b), United States v. Wolf (26 C. C. P. A. 243, C. A. D. 23) followed.

Protest 805703-G of Langfelder, Homma & Hayward, Inc., 2 Cust. Ct. 726 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

2 Cust. Ct. 726 (Protest 805703-G of Langfelder, Homma & Hayward, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.