Protest 804528-G of Brand Bros., Inc. (New York).

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 804528-G of Brand Bros., Inc. (New York).

5 Cust. Ct. 311

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedSeptember 11, 1940

DocketNo. 44302

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Cust. Ct. 311 (Protest 804528-G of Brand Bros., Inc. (New York).) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 804528-G of Brand Bros., Inc. (New York)., 5 Cust. Ct. 311 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

[312]*312Opinion by

Cline, J.

The sausage casings in question were packed in barrels and the record showed that four barrels were marked “Tientsin” and three were marked “Yokohama.” They were marked with the word “China” before thej7' were released from customs custody. On the authority of Ellis v. United States (3 Cust. Ct. 231, C. D. 242), holding that the name of a city alone is not sufficient, the protest was overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[312]*312Opinion by

Cline, J.

The sausage casings in question were packed in barrels and the record showed that four barrels were marked “Tientsin” and three were marked “Yokohama.” They were marked with the word “China” before thej7' were released from customs custody. On the authority of Ellis v. United States (3 Cust. Ct. 231, C. D. 242), holding that the name of a city alone is not sufficient, the protest was overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Cust. Ct. 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-804528-g-of-brand-bros-inc-new-york-cusc-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack