Protest 803316-G of Daniel

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 803316-G of Daniel

11 Cust. Ct. 219

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJuly 15, 1943

DocketNo. 48559

StatusPublished

This text of 11 Cust. Ct. 219 (Protest 803316-G of Daniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 803316-G of Daniel, 11 Cust. Ct. 219 (cusc 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The record showed that the merchandise was not capable of being marked, and that the cases, the immediate containers, were not marked to indicate the country of origin of the cippolini. The importer was required to mark the cases with the word “Morocco” before they were released from customs custody. As neither the merchandise nor the immediate coverings were legally marked it was held that the collector was justified in assessing additional duty. The protest was therefore overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The record showed that the merchandise was not capable of being marked, and that the cases, the immediate containers, were not marked to indicate the country of origin of the cippolini. The importer was required to mark the cases with the word “Morocco” before they were released from customs custody. As neither the merchandise nor the immediate coverings were legally marked it was held that the collector was justified in assessing additional duty. The protest was therefore overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Cust. Ct. 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-803316-g-of-daniel-cusc-1943.