Protest 803316-G of Daniel

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 803316-G of Daniel

11 Cust. Ct. 219

United States Customs Court·Decided July 15, 1943·No. No. 48559·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The record showed that the merchandise was not capable of being marked, and that the cases, the immediate containers, were not marked to indicate the country of origin of the cippolini. The importer was required to mark the cases with the word “Morocco” before they were released from customs custody. As neither the merchandise nor the immediate coverings were legally marked it was held that the collector was justified in assessing additional duty. The protest was therefore overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The record showed that the merchandise was not capable of being marked, and that the cases, the immediate containers, were not marked to indicate the country of origin of the cippolini. The importer was required to mark the cases with the word “Morocco” before they were released from customs custody. As neither the merchandise nor the immediate coverings were legally marked it was held that the collector was justified in assessing additional duty. The protest was therefore overruled.

Protest 803316-G of Daniel, 11 Cust. Ct. 219 (cusc 1943).

Pincite

11 Cust. Ct. 219 (Protest 803316-G of Daniel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.