Protest 803289-G of Neuman

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 803289-G of Neuman

11 Cust. Ct. 249

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedSeptember 1, 1943

DocketNo. 48705

StatusPublished

This text of 11 Cust. Ct. 249 (Protest 803289-G of Neuman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 803289-G of Neuman, 11 Cust. Ct. 249 (cusc 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The record showed that at the time of entry tags marked “Czechoslovia” were attached to the bales and that the importer was required to hand-mark the word “Czechoslovakia” on the bales before they were released from customs custody. The court was of the opinion that the tags, attached to the bales of feathers in this case accomplished a marking of the, goods sufficient to indicate to the consumer the name of the country of origin. The claim that the merchandise is not dutiable at the additional rate of 10 percent was therefore sustained. Asiam v. United States (25 C. C. P. A. 68, T. D. 49065): followed. American Hatters & Furriers Co. v. United States (1 Cust. Ct. 111, C. D. 31) and Abstracts 40549, 41128, and 42581 cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The record showed that at the time of entry tags marked “Czechoslovia” were attached to the bales and that the importer was required to hand-mark the word “Czechoslovakia” on the bales before they were released from customs custody. The court was of the opinion that the tags, attached to the bales of feathers in this case accomplished a marking of the, goods sufficient to indicate to the consumer the name of the country of origin. The claim that the merchandise is not dutiable at the additional rate of 10 percent was therefore sustained. Asiam v. United States (25 C. C. P. A. 68, T. D. 49065): followed. American Hatters & Furriers Co. v. United States (1 Cust. Ct. 111, C. D. 31) and Abstracts 40549, 41128, and 42581 cited.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Cust. Ct. 249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-803289-g-of-neuman-cusc-1943.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack