Protest 80059-K of Lun Tai & Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 80059-K of Lun Tai & Co.

16 Cust. Ct. 237

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1946

DocketNo. 50940

StatusPublished

This text of 16 Cust. Ct. 237 (Protest 80059-K of Lun Tai & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 80059-K of Lun Tai & Co., 16 Cust. Ct. 237 (cusc 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

[238]*238Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

At the trial a Government chemist testified that he had analyzed samples of the merchandise and found them to consist entirely of synthetic phenolic resin with a little pigment, and that the synthetic resin was not a binding agent. The case was submitted, plaintiff citing Abstract 50190. Upon the record presented and following the authority cited, the chopsticks in question were held properly dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[238]*238Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

At the trial a Government chemist testified that he had analyzed samples of the merchandise and found them to consist entirely of synthetic phenolic resin with a little pigment, and that the synthetic resin was not a binding agent. The case was submitted, plaintiff citing Abstract 50190. Upon the record presented and following the authority cited, the chopsticks in question were held properly dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 as claimed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 Cust. Ct. 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-80059-k-of-lun-tai-co-cusc-1946.