Protest 80059-K of Lun Tai & Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 80059-K of Lun Tai & Co.

16 Cust. Ct. 237

United States Customs Court·Decided July 1, 1946·No. No. 50940·Published

Opinion

[238]*238Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

At the trial a Government chemist testified that he had analyzed samples of the merchandise and found them to consist entirely of synthetic phenolic resin with a little pigment, and that the synthetic resin was not a binding agent. The case was submitted, plaintiff citing Abstract 50190. Upon the record presented and following the authority cited, the chopsticks in question were held properly dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[238]*238Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

At the trial a Government chemist testified that he had analyzed samples of the merchandise and found them to consist entirely of synthetic phenolic resin with a little pigment, and that the synthetic resin was not a binding agent. The case was submitted, plaintiff citing Abstract 50190. Upon the record presented and following the authority cited, the chopsticks in question were held properly dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 as claimed.

Protest 80059-K of Lun Tai & Co., 16 Cust. Ct. 237 (cusc 1946).

Pincite

16 Cust. Ct. 237 (Protest 80059-K of Lun Tai & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.