Protest 78687-G of Tennenbaum

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 78687-G of Tennenbaum

1 Cust. Ct. 476

United States Customs Court·Decided November 10, 1938·No. No. 39810·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) articles in chief value of cellulose compounds at 60 percent under paragraph 31, Abstract 37230 followed; (2) embroidered net ornaments at 75 percent under paragraph 1430, United States v. Ramig (17 C. C. P. A. 365, T. D. 43809) followed; and (3) artificial flowers the same as those the subject of Robinson-Goodman v. United States (id. 149, T. D. 43473) at 60 percent under paragraph 1419.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) articles in chief value of cellulose compounds at 60 percent under paragraph 31, Abstract 37230 followed; (2) embroidered net ornaments at 75 percent under paragraph 1430, United States v. Ramig (17 C. C. P. A. 365, T. D. 43809) followed; and (3) artificial flowers the same as those the subject of Robinson-Goodman v. United States (id. 149, T. D. 43473) at 60 percent under paragraph 1419.

Protest 78687-G of Tennenbaum, 1 Cust. Ct. 476 (cusc 1938).

Pincite

1 Cust. Ct. 476 (Protest 78687-G of Tennenbaum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.