Protest 78019-K of Sabbagh Bros.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 78019-K of Sabbagh Bros.

8 Cust. Ct. 472

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedFebruary 25, 1942

DocketNo. 46981

StatusPublished

This text of 8 Cust. Ct. 472 (Protest 78019-K of Sabbagh Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 78019-K of Sabbagh Bros., 8 Cust. Ct. 472 (cusc 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was agreed between counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of finished handkerchiefs from which threads have been drawn and with threads introduced after weaving to finish or ornament the openwork, which openwork does not consist of one row of straight hemstitching adjoining the hem; that the handkerchiefs contain no handmade lace and are not embroidered or tamboured in part by hand; and that they are similar to those the subject of Abstract 44036. In accordance therewith they were held dutiable at 30 percent ad valorem plus 2 cents each under paragraph 1529 (b) and T. D. 48093 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was agreed between counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of finished handkerchiefs from which threads have been drawn and with threads introduced after weaving to finish or ornament the openwork, which openwork does not consist of one row of straight hemstitching adjoining the hem; that the handkerchiefs contain no handmade lace and are not embroidered or tamboured in part by hand; and that they are similar to those the subject of Abstract 44036. In accordance therewith they were held dutiable at 30 percent ad valorem plus 2 cents each under paragraph 1529 (b) and T. D. 48093 as claimed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Cust. Ct. 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-78019-k-of-sabbagh-bros-cusc-1942.