Protest 77376-G of R. H. Macy & Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 77376-G of R. H. Macy & Co.

3 Cust. Ct. 381

United States Customs Court·Decided September 8, 1939·No. No. 42082·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel Normandy laces similar to those involved in Amrein v. United States (T. D. 49551), window curtains like those passed upon in Billwiler v. United States (T. D. 44911), silk veils similar to those involved in United States v. Ramig (17 C. C. P. A. 365, T. D. 43809), and filet articles similar to the merchandise covered by United States v. Jabara (22 id. 77, T. D. 47065) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel Normandy laces similar to those involved in Amrein v. United States (T. D. 49551), window curtains like those passed upon in Billwiler v. United States (T. D. 44911), silk veils similar to those involved in United States v. Ramig (17 C. C. P. A. 365, T. D. 43809), and filet articles similar to the merchandise covered by United States v. Jabara (22 id. 77, T. D. 47065) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.

Protest 77376-G of R. H. Macy & Co., 3 Cust. Ct. 381 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

3 Cust. Ct. 381 (Protest 77376-G of R. H. Macy & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.