Protest 7593-K of Woolwitch

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 7593-K of Woolwitch

11 Cust. Ct. 220

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJuly 17, 1943

DocketNo. 48568

StatusPublished

This text of 11 Cust. Ct. 220 (Protest 7593-K of Woolwitch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 7593-K of Woolwitch, 11 Cust. Ct. 220 (cusc 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

[221]*221Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

The invoice showed that the merchandise consists of handkerchiefs in the piece shipped from England. Depositions, taken under commission, of the departmental manager of the shippers of the merchandise and of the managing director and salesman of the manufacturers of said handkerchiefs were found entirely insufficient to prove that the component material of chief value of the handkerchiefs is linen. On the record presented the protest was overruled. United States v. Bacharach (T. D. 44612) and United States v. Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co., (T. D. 45337) cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[221]*221Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

The invoice showed that the merchandise consists of handkerchiefs in the piece shipped from England. Depositions, taken under commission, of the departmental manager of the shippers of the merchandise and of the managing director and salesman of the manufacturers of said handkerchiefs were found entirely insufficient to prove that the component material of chief value of the handkerchiefs is linen. On the record presented the protest was overruled. United States v. Bacharach (T. D. 44612) and United States v. Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co., (T. D. 45337) cited.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Cust. Ct. 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-7593-k-of-woolwitch-cusc-1943.