Protest 751122-G of Pressner

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 751122-G of Pressner

4 Cust. Ct. 490

United States Customs Court·Decided May 22, 1940·No. No. 43764·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) uninflated rubber balls like those the subject of United States v. Woolworth (24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770) at 30 percent under paragraph 1502; (2) squawker balloons at 45 percent under paragraph 409, Abstract 40493 followed; (3) india rubber articles similar to those the subject of Abstract 41517 at 25 percent under paragraph 1537; and (4) opera glasses at 35 percent under paragraph 228 (b) and the French Trade Agreement, Woolworth v. United States (2 Cust. Ct. 1, C. D. 74) followed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) uninflated rubber balls like those the subject of United States v. Woolworth (24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770) at 30 percent under paragraph 1502; (2) squawker balloons at 45 percent under paragraph 409, Abstract 40493 followed; (3) india rubber articles similar to those the subject of Abstract 41517 at 25 percent under paragraph 1537; and (4) opera glasses at 35 percent under paragraph 228 (b) and the French Trade Agreement, Woolworth v. United States (2 Cust. Ct. 1, C. D. 74) followed.

Protest 751122-G of Pressner, 4 Cust. Ct. 490 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

4 Cust. Ct. 490 (Protest 751122-G of Pressner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related