Protest 702910-G of Shaland

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 702910-G of Shaland

4 Cust. Ct. 504

United States Customs Court·Decided June 3, 1940·No. No. 43841·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) uninflated rubber balls at 30 per cent under paragraph 1502, United States v. Woolworth (24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770) followed; (2) squawker balloons or noisemakers in part of bamboo at 45 percent under paragraph 409, Abstract 40493 followed; and (3) articles in chief value of rubber similar to those the subject of Abstract 25607 at 25 percent under paragraph 1537 (b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) uninflated rubber balls at 30 per cent under paragraph 1502, United States v. Woolworth (24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770) followed; (2) squawker balloons or noisemakers in part of bamboo at 45 percent under paragraph 409, Abstract 40493 followed; and (3) articles in chief value of rubber similar to those the subject of Abstract 25607 at 25 percent under paragraph 1537 (b).

Protest 702910-G of Shaland, 4 Cust. Ct. 504 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

4 Cust. Ct. 504 (Protest 702910-G of Shaland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.