Protest 695912-G of Pressner

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 695912-G of Pressner

4 Cust. Ct. 464

United States Customs Court·Decided May 2, 1940·No. No. 43624·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) Beach balls at 30 percent under paragraph 1502, United States v. Woolworth (24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770) followed; (2) kazoos in chief value of metal at 45 percent under paragraph 397, Abstract 32264 followed; (3) fur animals similar to those the subject of Abstract 25607 at 50 percent under paragraph 1519 (e); (4) novelties in chief value of rubber at 25 percent under paragraph 1537 (b), Abstracts 25607 and 41517 followed; and (5) siren whistles and horns in chief value of m^tal at 45 percent under paragraph 397, Abstracts 39948 and 40480 followed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) Beach balls at 30 percent under paragraph 1502, United States v. Woolworth (24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770) followed; (2) kazoos in chief value of metal at 45 percent under paragraph 397, Abstract 32264 followed; (3) fur animals similar to those the subject of Abstract 25607 at 50 percent under paragraph 1519 (e); (4) novelties in chief value of rubber at 25 percent under paragraph 1537 (b), Abstracts 25607 and 41517 followed; and (5) siren whistles and horns in chief value of m^tal at 45 percent under paragraph 397, Abstracts 39948 and 40480 followed.

Protest 695912-G of Pressner, 4 Cust. Ct. 464 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

4 Cust. Ct. 464 (Protest 695912-G of Pressner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.