Protest 694661-G of Lisk

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 694661-G of Lisk

2 Cust. Ct. 737

United States Customs Court·Decided June 5, 1939·No. No. 41520·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) tennis rackets at 30 percent under paragraph 1502, Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 48573) followed; (2) rubber novelties similar to those the subject of Abstract 25607 at 25 percent under paragraph 1537(b); and (3) noisemakers in chief value of metal at 45 percent under paragraph 397, Abstract 25607 followed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) tennis rackets at 30 percent under paragraph 1502, Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 48573) followed; (2) rubber novelties similar to those the subject of Abstract 25607 at 25 percent under paragraph 1537(b); and (3) noisemakers in chief value of metal at 45 percent under paragraph 397, Abstract 25607 followed.

Protest 694661-G of Lisk, 2 Cust. Ct. 737 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

2 Cust. Ct. 737 (Protest 694661-G of Lisk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.