Protest 693809-G of S. Lisk & Bro.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 693809-G of S. Lisk & Bro.

4 Cust. Ct. 382

United States Customs Court·Decided January 29, 1940·No. No. 43130·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel novelties in chief value of rubber similar to those involved in Abstract 25607 were held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1537; joke articles in chief value of paper were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 1413, Abstract 37540 followed; uninflated rubber balls the same as those involved in United States v. Woolworth (24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770) were held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 1502; and rubber articles similar to those involved in Abstract 41517 were held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1537.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel novelties in chief value of rubber similar to those involved in Abstract 25607 were held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1537; joke articles in chief value of paper were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 1413, Abstract 37540 followed; uninflated rubber balls the same as those involved in United States v. Woolworth (24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770) were held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 1502; and rubber articles similar to those involved in Abstract 41517 were held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1537.

Protest 693809-G of S. Lisk & Bro., 4 Cust. Ct. 382 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

4 Cust. Ct. 382 (Protest 693809-G of S. Lisk & Bro.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.